[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Electronics Projects and PC Interfacing
- To: luci-discuss@luci.org
- Subject: Re: Electronics Projects and PC Interfacing
- From: Tim McDonough <tmcdonough@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:55:18 -0600
- DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r9oqx4wQOSeL1P1KKPErgk62NjHfLNauXb0XoEX2gZg=; b=ggIk/TazLAk5NJ8V8AB31J/FJugSvCNwVZr2Fk9FBUcNmc25Sf0rELFL2U8xUEijC6 NK/5YZNKKkmajjLMOXuDzON6sKlW2zn0rF1of3t89oymLSSgFN0MdazdtI2Hxrnn0P5e Bo1kgzTqs0TlPEZLlr4dPQ5P5Jd6WTUc/X7hI=
- DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=XKv6LOHEBgbW4SkJ8LIaYEim9NLEuboQCeKsXQkkbMYHPwt9jfsnqCTG++LXlY2lKH 1A8FC1wEC/vec7JlYY5oZBVkAE1CCc4Zhpg1gxsW6Hzmcy3D9Y6QHQLYPPtPQatKPKqL DIKbrLE2Fd7cBxT8HzmTI58if8WTBMzmRowsM=
- In-Reply-To: <4B2ED772.8060507@dannysauer.com>
- Organization: McDonough and Associates
- Organization: Linux Users of Central Illinois
- References: <a00c5a870912181249j6347ea1am4418e7a9a0bce60c@mail.gmail.com> <4B2ED772.8060507@dannysauer.com>
- Reply-To: luci-discuss@luci.org
- Sender: luci-discuss-owner@luci.org
- User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Nothing wrong with the PIC series at all. I'm not sure they have any
"cooler features" when compared to the AVR. I've used quite a few PIC
and Atmel parts both over the years. Hardware wise I think it's a toss
up between the two and both have lots of commercial and hobbyist type
support.
The biggest advantage the AVR series have over the PIC in my opinion is
the free AVR-GCC toolchain. There is no port of GCC for the PIC due to
the architecture whereas you can have C, C++, Java, etc. for the AVR
free for the downloading. The least expensive, well supported C compiler
for the PIC runs around $200 for a command line version. More for an IDE
that interfaces with the Microchip environment to get the debugger, etc.
Tim
Danny Sauer wrote:
> Is there any particular reason not to investigate the cooler features on
> the 8-bit PIC microcontrollers? There are flash memory PICs that can
> directly speak at RS232 levels, included buffered UARTs, have USB
> interfaces available, etc. You can get them for single-digit prices
> from places like Digikey, and there's zillions of tutorials out there
> with different examples.
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.