[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RPM size
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:31:52PM -0500, mike808 wrote:
> I prefer putting the size first, and sorting normally. The numbers get
> formatted to a uniform width, so the package names line up prettier too.
> rpm -qa --queryformat '%{SIZE}\t%{NAME}-%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\n' | sort -n
I'll agree with the alignment being prettier, but...
> This means you don't have to scroll back to get what you're looking for,
> namely, the largest packages.
I was assuming that you'd pipe the output to less, or maybe just head.
Steve
--
steve@silug.org | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-7360 | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard | http://www.silug.org/
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.
- References:
- RPM size
- From: Erich Schroeder <erich@museum.state.il.us>
- Re: RPM size
- From: Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>
- Re: RPM size
- From: mike808 <mike808@users.sourceforge.net>