[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PGP sig moved from Win2k to Linux

To: luci <luci-discuss@luci.org>
Subject: Re: PGP sig moved from Win2k to Linux
From: Kara Pritchard <kara@luci.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 12:14:47 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <20020305163129.15533.qmail@web20601.mail.yahoo.com>
Organization: Linux Users of Central Illinois
Reply-To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Sender: luci-discuss-owner@luci.org


I don't know about your problem, but for anyone interested in playing with 
such technology, I recommend using GPG instead of PGP. GPG can handle both 
GPG and PGP keys, whereas PGP can only handle PGP. (GPG is Gnu's PGP).

See it here!

http://www.gnupg.org/

-- 
Kara Pritchard                          Phone: 618-398-7360
Director of Exam Development            http://www.lpi.org/
--



-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.

References:
- PGP sig moved from Win2k to Linux
  - From: Robert Threet <rthreet@yahoo.com>

Prev by Date: Re: PGP sig moved from Win2k to Linux
Next by Date: Re: Proc shows mounted, but act like it isn't
Prev by thread: Re: PGP sig moved from Win2k to Linux
Next by thread: Re: Proc shows mounted, but act like it isn't
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread