[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: iptables performance

To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Subject: Re: iptables performance
From: Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 22:57:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20010926104621.K26029@cloud233.cloudmaster.com>; from sauer@cloudmaster.com on Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 10:46:21AM -0500
Organization: Linux Users of Central Illinois
References: <20010926104621.K26029@cloud233.cloudmaster.com>
Reply-To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Sender: owner-luci-discuss@luci.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 10:46:21AM -0500, Danny Sauer wrote:
> I've used squid with a rewrite script to block ads before (the one at
> taz.net.au), but would rather not have to set up a transparent proxy at
> this time.

Why not?  It'll speed things up if anything.

Besides, you could slap junkbuster in there too.

Steve
-- 
steve@silug.org           | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-7360             | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard          | http://www.silug.org/
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: iptables performance
  - From: Danny Sauer <sauer@cloudmaster.com>

References:
- iptables performance
  - From: Danny Sauer <sauer@cloudmaster.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Slack
Next by Date: d: Re: iptables performance
Prev by thread: iptables performance
Next by thread: Re: iptables performance
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread