[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.

To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Subject: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
From: Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:50:11 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102141534260.2539-100000@24-148-53-233.na.21stcentury.net>"from charles@lunarmedia.net at Feb 14, 2001 03:42:52 pm"
Organization: Linux Users of Central Illinois
Reply-To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Sender: owner-luci-discuss@luci.org

charles@lunarmedia.net said:
> the only difference i see with the classless is that you end up setting up
> cname records that end up pointing to the actual ptr rather than ns
> records:

Using CNAMEs in reverse DNS just doesn't seem to work well.  I'd
suggest sticking with NS records.  That's guaranteed to work.

Steve
-- 
steve@silug.org           | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-7320             | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard          | http://www.silug.org/
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.

References:
- Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
  - From: charles@lunarmedia.net

Prev by Date: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Next by Date: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Prev by thread: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Next by thread: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread