[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.

To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Subject: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
From: Steven Pritchard <steve@silug.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:26:38 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0102141511370.1331-100000@24-148-53-233.na.21stcentury.net>"from charles@lunarmedia.net at Feb 14, 2001 03:17:38 pm"
Organization: Linux Users of Central Illinois
Reply-To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Sender: owner-luci-discuss@luci.org

charles@lunarmedia.net said:
> I just expected an easier method of delegation rather than per ip address.

Like I said, you can delegate a level higher, but that'll break things
for recursive clients.

If I remember correctly, there's an RFC on classless in-addr.arpa
delegation...  Maybe they have better ideas.

Steve
-- 
steve@silug.org           | Southern Illinois Linux Users Group
(618)398-7320             | See web site for meeting details.
Steven Pritchard          | http://www.silug.org/
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
  - From: charles@lunarmedia.net

References:
- Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
  - From: charles@lunarmedia.net

Prev by Date: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Next by Date: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Prev by thread: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Next by thread: Re: delegating in-addr.arpa.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread