[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: tulip problem

To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Subject: Re: tulip problem
From: Jordan Bettis <jordanb@m-net.arbornet.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 02:53:36 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010171930200.34622-100000@m-net.arbornet.org>
Organization: Linux Users of Central Illinois
Reply-To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Sender: owner-luci-discuss@luci.org

Well, I just happened to notice that ifconfig -a actually showed the
device, so I went ahead and configured the interface and rebooted. After
it rebooted, /proc/interrpts was able to find it, as was
lsmod. /proc/ioports is still fucked. Ifconfig can't seem to find the
right ioport ether, but Donald Becker said that ifconfig is basically on
crack when it comes to that.

It is only sending at about 3.5Mbps, but I am following an evolving
conversation on tulip-bug on that issue right now. 

Jordan Bettis.
"Probably the best operating system in the world is the [operating system]
 made for the PDP-11 by Bell Laboratories." - Ted Nelson, October 1977

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tulip problem
  - From: Jason Burke <jburke@luci.org>

References:
- Re: tulip problem
  - From: Jordan Bettis <jordanb@m-net.arbornet.org>

Prev by Date: Re: tulip problem
Next by Date: Re: tulip problem
Prev by thread: Re: tulip problem
Next by thread: Re: tulip problem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread