[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fixed the problem on mah own! [Old message: SCSI is mine greatest enemy. (Performance on a 486)]
Just in case anyone has the IO squelching problems listed as below..
This can easily be fixed using hdparm -u1 /dev/device.. from the hdparm
man page:
-u Get/set interrupt-unmask flag for the drive. A
setting of 1 permits the driver to unmask other
interrupts during processing of a disk interrupt,
which greatly improves Linux's responsiveness and
eliminates "serial port overrun" errors. Use this
feature with caution: some drive/controller combi-
nations do not tolerate the increased I/O latencies
possible when this feature is enabled, resulting in
massive filesystem corruption. In particular,
CMD-640B and RZ1000 (E)IDE interfaces can be unre-
liable (due to a hardware flaw) when this option is
used with kernel versions earlier than 2.0.13.
Disabling the IDE prefetch feature of these inter-
faces (usually a BIOS/CMOS setting) provides a safe
fix for the problem for use with earlier kernels.
Yay! ... sometimes you find the most helpful things when doing something
barely related to it.. (APM setting optimizations for a laptop led me to find
this :) )
Regards,
Mike
----- Forwarded message from --Damacus-- <damacus@bastion.cnsnet.net> -----
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:47:09 -0500
To: luci-discuss@luci.org
Subject: SCSI is mine greatest enemy. (Performance on a 486)
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
OK, I've got two questions to ask tonight:
Anyhow, I have on it 8.7GB in it-- 5GB SCSI, 3.7 IDE. This comp has an only
ISA (8MHz) bus, thus an Adaptec ISA SCSI card, and when xferring files from 1
SCSI drive to another, or 1 SCSI drive to another comp (mainly via SMB) , or
even just untarring a file on a SCSI drive things CRAWL. The modem seems to
just sit there and does nothing. Many a times, I'll be untarring a 80M file
or so, and from another room I'll hear "Goodbye." followed by many
explenitives as my dad's AOL connection times out.
Q- Is there any way to give SCSI access a lower priority, or give
serial/network a higher priority as to not make them unusable under high IO
loads?
Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.
-- Ferenc Mantfeld
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Damacus | damacus@bastion.cnsnet.net ** damacus@statiknet.org
New as of 6/14 | PGP: http://bastion.cnsnet.net/~damacus/damacus-key.asc
| Administrator, Cimarron Network Services, Inc.
IRC: (EFnet) | #statik http://www.statiknet.org
nick: damacus | #dc-stuff http://www.attrition.org/ (hosted/dc-stuff)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust the computer industry to shorten "Year 2000" to Y2K. It was
this kind of thinking that caused the problem in the first place.
--
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.